“Think globally and act locally!”

 

This is the standard saying of those pushing to implement a universal (global) form of government.  It’s a one-size-fits-all program – and its underlying them is socialism / fascism.

 

Socialism defined:  –noun (from dictionary.com)

 
1. a theory or system of social organization  that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.

In other words, no privately owned  property.

3.  (in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.

Collectivism – if you’re a Star Trek fan – then remember what the Borg’s standard statement was: “Resistance is futile; you will be assimilated.”

Sustainability defined: (from www.sustainablemeasures.com)

“There may be as many definitions of sustainability and sustainable development as there are groups trying to define it. All the definitions have to do with:

  • Living within the limits
  • Understanding the interconnections among economy, society, and environment
  • Equitable distribution of resources and opportunities”

It might be easier to define sustainability by letting you know what is “not” sustainable, according to UN Agenda 21:

Here’s what Maurice Strong, socialist, senior adviser to the Commission on Global Governance and driving force behind promoting the concept of “sustainability”, said when introducing the term at the 1992 Rio Conference (Earth Summit II):

“Industrialized countries [Americans] have “developed and benefited from the unsustainable patterns of production and consumption which have produced our present dilemma. It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption pattern of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning and suburban housing – are not sustainable. A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less geared to environmentally damaging consumption patterns.”

Strong also explains in an essay that the concept of sovereignty has to yield in favor of the “new imperatives of global environmental cooperative.”

Watch the following video for information about Agenda 21: